A Magic Bullet Made of Thorium: The Next Big Thing? (#nuclearenergy)

According to the Guardian:
There is no certain bet in nuclear physics but work by Nobel laureate Carlo Rubbia at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research) on the use of thorium as a cheap, clean and safe alternative to uranium in reactors may be the magic bullet we have all been hoping for, though we have barely begun to crack the potential of solar power.
Dr Rubbia says a tonne of the silvery metal – named after the Norse god of thunder, who also gave us Thor’s day or Thursday - produces as much energy as 200 tonnes of uranium, or 3,500,000 tonnes of coal. A mere fistful would light London for a week.

Lomborg Kinda Sorta Reverses Himself (#climatechange #AGW #lomborg)

Bjorn Lomborg has come out in favor of a carbon tax and additional spending to deal with climate change.  Now everyone is all excited that a climate "skeptic" has made a u-turn.

But Lomborg wasn't really a skeptic on the science, he just believed that there were other environmental challenges that were more important, or at least more easily solved, that affect the lives of many more individuals than warming. I don't consider this a true reversal, as it sounds like his new book will at least consider different ways of handling the fallout from climate change, as opposed to the one way that most adherents of climate change orthodoxy espouse: a return to the pre-technological ages.

We Are All Libertarians Now [Ok, Probably Not You. But I am]

In defending [distinguishing?] himself from being "the most famous liberaltarian", Reason's Nick Gillespie gives a wonderfully succinct definition of what it is to be a libertarian:
it's a belief that life is too precious to be wasted on something as stupid as politics, so let's shrink the areas in which that sort of consenus is necessary to the smallest sphere possible. And then let's let folks live their lives basically however they want as long as they're not infringing on other's people rights to do the same.
When viewed from this distilled soundbite of common sense, it's amazing libertarianism is so unpopular (from both sides) all across these United States (and pretty much everywhere else, too).

No, Hello Kitty was NOT created to reward the Devil (#hellokitty)

The controversy has [finally!] been settled.  Hello Kitty has nothing to do with the devil.  The same, however, cannot be said for the Little Twin Stars.

LOL: "Conspicuous Conservation" Shoes Make it Look Like You Were Near an Oil Spill

These shoes provide a great service.  Not only do you know that the person wearing them wants to appear environmentally conscious, but you also know he or she is a narcissist.

David Friedman on Whether Obama is [even] a Christian

Friedman wonders how you can really ever know, since being an atheist or agnostic is political suicide.

I totally agree.  In fact, I'd be willing to bet that the majority of people who voted for Obama believed that he was not actually a Christian (in the sense of believing the metaphysics of the religion, as opposed to merely being philosophically sympathetic to the teachings of Jesus), despite the fact that he attended church and practiced the customs of the religion.

Susan Jacoby on Ayaan Hirsi Ali on What's Wrong with Cultural Relativism (#ayaanhirsiali)

Jacoby rightly questions, as Hitchens and Miller have, why their peers (or ex-peers) on the left think that cultures have a presumption of equality and value.

Actually Useful Link: What Can the Health Care Reform Actually do for You? (#obamacare #healthcare)

The NCPA lays it all out.  Take a look, just in case you haven't read the bill, or if you've just been listening to the pundits.

Why is Facebook Worth Anything? (#facebook)

Apparently, some people are pricing Facebook at $33 billion.  Why?  Have you ever clicked on an ad in Facebook?  I haven't.  Do you pay Facebook any money for their services?  I haven't. Who is, and why would they?  As far as I can tell, Facebook offers free web hosting and almost nothing else.  They generate no content. All activity is user-generated.  Can someone explain this mystery to me in the comments?

A Dog in Every Office Across America (#dogs)

According to some research, just having a dog around makes people more cooperative:
To reach this conclusion, they carried out two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product. Everyone was asked to contribute ideas for the ad, but ultimately the group had to decide on only one. . . . Some of the groups had a dog underfoot throughout, while the others had none. After the task, all the volunteers had to answer a questionnaire on how they felt about working with the other—human—members of the team. Mr Honts found that those who had had a dog to slobber and pounce on them ranked their team-mates more highly on measures of trust, team cohesion and intimacy than those who had not.
In the other experiment, which used 13 groups, the researchers explored how the presence of an animal altered players’ behaviour in a game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. In the version of this game played by the volunteers, all four members of each group had been “charged” with a crime. Individually, they could choose (without being able to talk to the others) either to snitch on their team-mates or to stand by them. Each individual’s decision affected the outcomes for the other three as well as for himself in a way that was explained in advance. The lightest putative sentence would be given to someone who chose to snitch while the other three did not; the heaviest penalty would be borne by a lone non-snitch. The second-best outcome came when all four decided not to snitch. . . . Having a dog around made volunteers 30% less likely to snitch than those who played without one. 

A Man's Eye View on Eat Pray Love (#eatpraylove)

Ladies: These are the top five reactions your man will have to Eat Pray Love-- if you can force him to watch Eat Pray Love.

1. Your man will find it hard to sympathize with Liz Gilbert (the memoir's author) during the first half-hour of the movie. How depressing it is to be an attractive, likable, witty, wealthy, successful person living in New York City! And her worst problem was that she had a slightly dopey dude for a husband, who loved her and wasn't emotionally or physically abusive (from what we can tell). Gahd, can it get any worse? Yes! You can date a handsome, spiritual, charming, young actor (James Franco). That will really drive you into the depths of depression.

2. Your man will be outraged that they decided to play "Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen" from Mozart's "The Magic Flute" while Julia Roberts slurped up her first magical bites of spaghetti in Italy. She's orgasmically experiencing the essential Italian food, and the movie is accompanying it with an angry aria in German composed by an Austrian! Have you ever heard of Puccini or Verdi, Ryan Murphy? Have you?  There are plenty of perfectly good Italian operas you could have chosen from. Jeez. [Ed. note: No man will actually notice this].

3. Your man will wonder how Liz Gilbert could travel all the way to India to study under a guru that lives in New York City. Gilbert's a writer! Doesn't she know how to do research? This is highly unbelievable.

4. Your man will be impressed by the stand-out performance of Richard Jenkins as "Richard from Texas", the blustery bowhard with a tragic past who prods Liz Gilbert with motivational drivel during her stay at the Indian ashram. Your man will also most likely recognize Jenkins primarily from Farrelly Bros. movies, but your man might have also seen Jenkins in his understated Oscar-nominated role in The Visitor (which is kind of like the American version of Dirty Pretty Things, i.e. an emotional tale of the hardships surrounding illegal immigration).

5. Your man will grudgingly accept that Javier Bardem is a sexy, rugged, manly man, but he'll harbor the secret joyful knowledge that Bardem is not exactly handsome. The man is all face. There's just too much of it. It's like he's some strange, handsome-ish mash up of Brad Garrett, a neanderthal, and Mask.

If the Chernobyl disaster occurred in Chicago . . . (#chicago #chernobyl)

. . .the whole of the continental U.S. (save Maine) would have been covered with a radiation cloud.

On the Awesomeness of Trader Joe's (#traderjoes)

Best. Grocery. Store. Ever. Period.

Of Gears and GIFs (#engineering)

It's like an Epcot ride through the wonderful world of everyday mechanisms!

Links for Reel Nerds (#socialnetwork #scottpilgrim #xmen #blackswan)

The Sane Quarter (#occult #skepticism #paranormal #supernatural)

According to a Gallup poll, 73% of Americans believe in at least one of the 10 following things:
ESP, haunted houses, ghosts, telepathy, clairvoyance, astrology, communication with the dead, witches, reincarnation, or channeling. 
These really encompass two large categories of paranormal activity: life after death and superhuman ability (loosely inclusive of "witches", women who have superpowers that might include ESP, telepathy, and clairvoyance).  The former is merely wishful thinking and the latter is a result of the correlation fallacy.

It's discouraging, but not especially worrisome.  Personally, I think the very commonly held belief in Hell and the Devil are far more ridiculous than any of the above (except for maybe astrology). The good news is that 27% of Americans believe in none of them.  I hope that's accurate.  I would have put it closer to 10%.  

The Hindenburg Omen: A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? (#hindenburgomen)

The Hindenburg Omen:
Signals that point to a stock plunge, including the Hindenburg Omen, named for a German zeppelin that caught fire and crashed more than seven decades ago, have increased investors’ negative sentiment toward equity markets, Levkovich, said today in a radio interview with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Surveillance. The Hindenburg Omen, occurring when an unusually high number of companies on the New York Stock Exchange reach 52-week highs and lows, only signals a slump in stocks one in four times, Levkovich said.

The most innovative #welfare scam ever: the #Anchorbaby Daddy / Robin Hood of Sperm

According to El Mundo, a German guy is going to poor countries (Paraguay, in one instance) and fathering as many children as possible so that each child's mother can receive a 500 euros a month subsidy from the German government. The German treasury already has paid out over three million euros to various children under his (supposed) paternity.

Come on, people: Stop propping up #housing prices, already!

As Kid Dynamite eloquently observes:
The reason that people can't afford to make real (that is: in the neighborhood of 20%) down payments is because, and I've said this many times before, home prices are too high - not because home prices need more stimulus/support/propping up.
And as Karl Denninger notes:
In point of fact the government should encourage prices to contract to affordable and stable levels, from which they should not vary materially on a forward basis. This then turns homes into a place to live, instead of a speculative asset class.
Bill Gross says that the "cost" of a private system could be 300 basis points over Treasuries. So what?
He says this makes housing "unaffordable." My retort is at what price?
Notice what's not being talked about here: actually deflating the bubble, and returning homes to a price where Americans can actually afford them."
The orthodoxy on housing is, along with drug policy, one of the more irrational policies that seems to have almost impenetrable inertia. Where is the common sense?

That #Inception Score can [Almost] Make Anything Seem Serious . . .

Even Dumb and Dumber?

Wait, You Mean Birthright Citizenship Isn't the Standard? (#immigration)

Will Wilkinson informs us otherwise:
Other than our neighbors, Canada and Mexico, the U.S. is the only OECD country with a pure jus soli citizenship rule.
The rest of the post explores possible alternatives to our system, including analysis of the Irish, Australian, and German systems. Of course, any change would require a Constitutional amendment, but if it were a reasonable change, and not vulnerable to a charge of xenophobia or racism, it might get the required votes.

Where Does the Laffer Curve actually bend? ( #laffercurve #economics #tax )

See Ezra Klein's post here. Tax experts say the Laffer Curve bends at 60-69%.  Lefties say 70% or higher, and Righties say anywhere from 19 to 63%. The major issue seems to be long-term versus short-term: a very high income tax rate might be optimal in terms of revenue, but not in terms of growth, so in the long-term, the optimal revenue-producing rate might end up not being so optimal.

Here Comes Everybody, or Does Nobody Understand? ( #jamesjoyce #finneganswake )

Kottke (but not Kottke) just posted on famous last words.  James Joyce's last words were (supposedly):
Does nobody understand?
Sounds kind of sad, but considering that he spend the last seventeen years of his life going blind and writing Finnegans Wake, which half of the people believe is the biggest literary practical joke in history (the other half believe it's a polyglot, unreadable work of dense modern art), it seems appropriate.

Bubble of Higher-Ed, like all bubbles, is built on public policy in favor of taking on large amounts of debt ( #college #bubbles )

Crossing Wall St. on the bubble of higher education: "Much like the housing bubble, the Higher Ed bubble is being driven by cheap, government supported credit. The problem is compounded by the fact that hugely important financial decisions are placed on the backs of 19-year-olds, many of whom simply don't have the life experience to weigh the implications of a gigantic, 20-year debt load. Heck, at least the irresponsible mortgage borrowers during the crazy days were adults (even though many acted like infants)."

Kudos to the Fake Bus Stop AKA Alzheimer's patient magnet ( #alzheimers #dusseldorf )

More here.  When they wander off (often looking for their families) they eventually forget where they are or what they're looking for, and so they will often just sit at the nearest bus stop.  Brilliant move by the Benrath Senior Center and the "Old Lions" care center in Dusseldorf, Germany.

Paging Diotallevi: LeBron the Hermetic Overlord? ( #LeBron #Bosh #wade #miamiheat #NBA #hermeticism )

Yes, it's true: LeBron and his cohorts are ILLUMINATI! 

Massachusetts Gets the Ball Rolling on Killing the Electoral College ( #electoralcollege #Massachusetts #presidentialelection #17thAmendment )

According to boston.com: "Under the law . . . all 12 of the state's electoral votes would be awarded to the candidate who receives the most votes nationally. . .  Once states accounting for a majority of the electoral votes (or 270 of 538) have enacted the laws, the candidate winning the most votes nationally would be assured a majority of Electoral College votes. That would hold true no matter how the other states vote and how their electoral votes are distributed."
 
Obviously, a Constitutional amendment could never happen, since it would require ratification by 3/4ths of the states -- and the Electoral College benefits the individual voters in the states with smaller populations (which constitute greater than 25% of all states).  But this end-around seems Constitutional, at first glance, since states can set their own rules on how they allocate electors.  Now if they could only repeal the 17th Amendment, our system of representative democracy might make a little sense. 

Barcelona Bans the B.S. (Bull Skewering, not Bull Shit) ( #barcelona #catalunya #bullfighting #spain )

Kudos to Catalunya for banning that second most Spanish of needless cruelties (after the Inquisition, of course), bullfighting.  Ostensibly, it's about animal rights, but it could be construed as another step in the nationalist movement to secede from Spain. [Potential ralying cry: "Get rowdy with Gaudi!"]

Why hasn't the suicide rate dropped? ( #suicide #health #psychology )

Brendan Koerner wonders. He thinks it might have something to do with "desperate economic circumstances and poor mental health."  But if that's true, wouldn't the rate be going down, with the advent of supposedly remarkable pharmaceutical anti-depressants?  My guess is that suicide is mostly driven by either social alienation or shame -- you have no friends, or you don't think you deserve them.  If this is the case, different cultures, with differing attitudes and values associated with social interaction, should have different rates, and they do.  Maybe suicide is a cultural constant -- perhaps along with income inequality and mating patterns.

Cow Clicker is a post-post-post-modern game of time destruction ( #cowclicker #postmodernism )

Ian Bogost explains his twisted, Facebook-mocking challenge-less game:
Cow Clicker is a Facebook game about Facebook games. It's partly a satire, and partly a playable theory of today's social games, and partly an earnest example of that genre. You get a cow. You can click on it. In six hours, you can click it again. Clicking earns you clicks. You can buy custom "premium" cows through micropayments (the Cow Clicker currency is called "mooney"), and you can buy your way out of the time delay by spending it. You can publish feed stories about clicking your cow, and you can click friends' cow clicks in their feed stories. Cow Clicker is Facebook games distilled to their essence.
More:
I had formulated some thoughts about why these games bothered me. Whether or not they were "really games" wasn't the issue; I have a long history of defending all sorts of edge cases against that accusation. Nor was it the platform on which they are played; games that use friend networks as infrastructure for asynchronous, social play has long seemed promising to me. . . Rather, I found myself troubled by the way in which these games were games, the manner by which they seemed to magnify the dangerous aspects of games, making those aspects the only ones visible.
Bogost goes on to name these aspects: ENFRAMING (friends as tools to achieve some end), COMPULSION, OPTIONALISM (active effort, as in chess, for example, is optional and gameplay is rote), and DESTROYED TIME.

This Week in Reel Nerd-ery ( #lisbethsalander #chugyeogja #pekar #crazy4cult #predators #cyrus )

Gary Johnson : GOP :: Life Support : Dying Patient ( #garyjohnson #immigration )

Ex-governor of New Mexico and possible future Republican presidential candidate Gary Johnson injects some common sense into the immigration debate:
Johnson said there were more illegal immigrants in the U.S. back when he was governor. "When I was governor, I asked for a cost-benefits analysis. Are we paying out more than we're getting in, given the fact that (immigrants) do pay taxes — income tax, Social Security, Medicare. Immigrants who have used false documents to get work don't collect tax refunds, Johnson said. His administration determined that the state got more tax revenue from illegal immigrants than the state was paying out in benefits.
Smell that fresh air? More here.

LeBron James and the Unyielding Deluge of Pressure ( #lebron #NBA #miamiheat )

The Heat now have three of the top five players from the 2003 Draft. This is bigger than Kobe with Shaq, Malone, and Payton or Garnett, Allen, and Pierce. They simply cannot lose without becoming a huge embarrassment. And mark my words: If LeBroshwade doesn't win a championship next year, LeBron will forever become a punchline. And even if they do win, he'll be remembered as a player who needed two superstars as crutches. He's lost a mantle of greatness by taking this low-hanging fruit instead of blazing his own trail.

And let's also not forget the slippery slope:  Do we want the NBA to permanently become a league of haves and have nots, with three or four superstar magnets like the Harlem Globetrotters, each beneficiaries of collusive lopsided trades (Gasol for Kwame? Come on!) or big-time players taking smaller contracts so they can win? I think not.

The best thing for basketball would be for the Heat to lose, sad to say.  Otherwise it might just be Lakers-Heat for the foreseeable future. Why bother even having a draft?

Save Paul, the Precogctopus! ( #paul #worldcup #germany #precogctopus )

People don't realize it, but Octopi are super-smart.  They can shapeshift, camouflage themselves,and even solve puzzles that would make a chimp toss its feces in frustration.  Paul, the "Precogctopus", who resides in a German aquarium, correctly predicted that Spain would beat Germany in the World Cup semifinals.  Now Germans want to kill and eat Paul!  It's not Paul's fault that his mollusk brain is so advanced that it allows him to tell the future.  Don't kill the messenger.  You people are monsters!

No Offsides, Two Goalies ( #soccer #football #goalkeeper #offsides #worldcup )

Obviously, they'll never change soccer (le foot, football) to make it fairer or easier to referee.  So I propose that we create a new sport here. This sport will be just like soccer, only there will be no offsides calls, but as a trade off, there will be two goalkeepers.  The goalies would both have all the privileges of a normal goalie, and could even use their hands outside the box, as long as they remained on their half of the field.

Blackwater: Different Name, Same Game ( #military #cia #blackwater )

Blackwater never went away, it just changed its name to Xe Services.  Oh, nice try!  You thought you could trick us, you old so-and-sos.  But that doesn't work . . . oh wait, yeah, it worked.  Oh life, why do you have to imitate 24?

Waterless Urinal vs. Plumbers ( #unions #plumbing #protectionism )

Safety concerns over the "waterless urinal" are being used by plumbers to protect their jobs. Or at least, you could read it that way.   HT: Wired.

Hey, Human Genome, What Have You Done For Me Lately? ( #genome #genetics )

Happy tenth birthday, genome.  Nice to see you, but I guess you can't help me out too much, huh?  Too bad.  Next time, maybe.

Game Theory Foils a Balanced Budget Compromise? ( #deficit #austerity #taxes #gametheory )

From Arnold Kling (paraphrasing Eugene Steuerle):
Democrats think that if they agree to spending cuts to reduce the deficit, then Republicans will take advantage of that by passing tax cuts. Meanwhile, Republicans think that if they agree to tax increases to reduce the deficit, then Democrats will take advantage of that by raising spending. The equilibrium strategy is for neither party to compromise on deficit reduction.

Yuan vs. Renminbi: What's What? ( #china #yuan #renminbi #currency )

Both are Chinese currency, of course, but why two names? Renminbi means "The People's Currency" and is the official name for the currency, but the yuan is the unit of measure for the renminbi. So you would never say "three renmimbi," you'd say "three yuan." But if you were talking about the appreciation of the Chinese currency, you'd say the "appreciation of the renmibi."   HT: BBC

Kudos to the Berlin Slide Experiment ( #berlin #vw )

Which one would you pick: a giant red slide in a subway station or an escalator?

No Use Crying Over Spilled Milk . . . OR IS THERE?

According to the EPA, yes! http://www.hollandsentinel.com/news/x1224670387/Outcry-from-farmers-over-spilled-milk-rule

Smart People Think They're More Left Wing Than They Really Are

. . . according to this study: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/lecleecon/09_2f23.htm.  I haven't read the study, so I can't really approve of the results [most studies are, in my opinion, bunk].  But anecdotally speaking, based on my experiences, I think the conclusion is likely to be true.

Watch an Air Cannon Knock Shit Over!

Interesting Thoughts for Father's Day: Don't Fight Your Kids' Nature

From Bryan Caplan:
Think about everything parents want for their children. The traits most parents hope for show family resemblance: If you're healthy, smart, happy, educated, rich, righteous or appreciative, the same tends to be true for your parents, siblings and children. Of course, it's difficult to tell nature from nurture. To disentangle the two, researchers known as behavioral geneticists have focused on two kinds of families: those with twins, and those that adopt. If identical twins show a stronger resemblance than fraternal twins, the reason is probably nature. If adoptees show any resemblance to the families that raised them, the reason is probably nurture.
Parents try to instill healthy habits that last a lifetime. But the two best behavioral genetic studies of life expectancy—one of 6,000 Danish twins born between 1870 and 1900, the other of 9,000 Swedish twins born between 1886 and 1925—found zero effect of upbringing. Twin studies of height, weight and even teeth reach similar conclusions. This doesn't mean that diet, exercise and tooth-brushing don't matter—just that parental pressure to eat right, exercise and brush your teeth after meals fails to win children's hearts and minds.
Parents also strive to turn their children into smart and happy adults, but behavioral geneticists find little or no evidence that their effort pays off. In research including hundreds of twins who were raised apart, identical twins turn out to be much more alike in intelligence and happiness than fraternal twins, but twins raised together are barely more alike than twins raised apart. In fact, pioneering research by University of Minnesota psychologist David Lykken found that twins raised apart were more alike in happiness than twins raised together. Maybe it's just a fluke, but it suggests that growing up together inspires people to differentiate themselves; if he's the happy one, I'll be the malcontent.
And:
The most meaningful fruit of parenting, however, is simply appreciation—the way your children perceive and remember you. When 1,400 older Swedish twins were asked to describe their parents, identical twins' answers were only slightly more similar than fraternal twins', and twins raised together gave much more similar answers than twins raised apart. If you create a loving and harmonious home for your children, they'll probably remember it for as long as they live.
And, in summary:
Many find behavioral genetics depressing, but it's great news for parents and potential parents. If you think that your kids' future rests in your hands, you'll probably make many painful "investments"—and feel guilty that you didn't do more. Once you realize that your kids' future largely rests in their own hands, you can give yourself a guilt-free break.
If you enjoy reading with your children, wonderful. But if you skip the nightly book, you're not stunting their intelligence, ruining their chances for college or dooming them to a dead-end job. The same goes for the other dilemmas that weigh on parents' consciences. Watching television, playing sports, eating vegetables, living in the right neighborhood: Your choices have little effect on your kids' development, so it's OK to relax. In fact, relaxing is better for the whole family. Riding your kids "for their own good" rarely pays off, and it may hurt how your children feel about you.

Kudos to Sam Brownback For Proposing a Gov't Agency in Charge of Repealing Useless Laws

More here.  And here. Good for him.  If there's one thing I hate, it's redundancy.  I really despise it when things are repeated unnecessarily.

Don't Call Me Stupid for "Not Getting" the iPad

I'm sure there are productive uses for an iPad, but converting your restaurant's menu to an iPad format isn't one of them, as Foreign Policy blogger Brian Fung boldly declares.

At the very least, "westerners" shouldn't be chided for "being confused" or "not getting it."  If your business plan involves spending $500 on a substitute for an almost costless alternative that works just as well (paper, ink), then you either don't need to make a profit, or you'll be out of business quickly.  The iPad starts at $500.  Simply put, this technology is for people who have too much money.  There is no need for it.  It will change nothing.  Smaller and easier is the future, and honestly, the iPad ain't small and using a touchscreen ain't that easy.

Contemplating the End of the Mortgage Interest Deduction

The Hill breaks down the possibility of ending the ever-popular mortgage interest deduction.   Unfortunately, Obama's proposal doesn't go far enough (it would cut the deduction rate for itemized expenses for only those making more than $250,000 to the rate paid by the middle class).  From the linked article, it sounds like it's being framed as an income inequality issue, which it's not.

Dismantling the mortgage interest deduction entirely, or pairing it with a deduction for any property expenses (rent), would be a first step in taking down the system that created the housing bubble -- a system characterized by the mortgage interest deduction, the endless appetite for mortgages by Fannie and Freddie, and the widespread belief that property just automatically increases in price over time.

Carr: Non-Traditional Alignment on the Supreme Court

Just a reminder that legal and policy issues sometimes (perhaps, oftentimes) transcend the odd and arbitrary boundaries of the American party system. For example, the division on the Supreme Court case of Carr v. U.S. [pdf]*:
Majority: Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Kennedy, and Breyer
Partial Concurrence: Scalia
Dissent: Alito, joined by Thomas and Ginsburg
*FYI, the case concerned SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act).

Giving Up on the Oil Spill is a Choice

According to MSNBC.com:
The public anger and frustration over the spill poses a major domestic challenge for Obama, who has been forced to admit publicly that the U.S. government and military do not have the technology to plug the leaking well and must leave this to BP and its private industry partners.
Say what now?  "Do not have the technology"? This is patently incorrect: the technology is available to the government.  They should just admit that they prefer a continued spill and ensuing environmental disaster to the uncertainty surrounding a targeted nuclear blast on the ocean floor.

Obamafail? Didn't Consider Nuclear Option on the Gulf Oil Spill

Robin Hanson on the possibility that a nuclear explosion on the oil leak site might have been overlooked despite serious evidence that, all things considered (even environmentally), it might have been the best option.

Extra Credit: Michigan State Legislator Justin Amash Posts All His Votes on Facebook

Finally, someone is using Facebook for something useful: to enhance our sense of civil society through transparency and disclosure.  See more here and here.  HT to Reason.com.

Thought of the Day: Discrimination Against the Unpretty

From Robin Hanson (and his quoted material from other sources):
'Unattractive people are less likely to be hired and promoted, and they earn lower salaries, even in fields in which looks have no obvious relationship to professional duties. . . For lawyers, such prejudice can translate to a pay cut of as much as 12 percent. When researchers ask people to evaluate written essays, the same material receives lower ratings for ideas, style and creativity when an accompanying photograph shows a less attractive author. Good-looking professors get better course evaluations from students; teachers in turn rate good-looking students as more intelligent. . . . In studies that simulate legal proceedings, unattractive plaintiffs receive lower damage awards. [Researchers] gave students case studies involving real criminal defendants and asked them to come to a verdict and a punishment for each. The students gave unattractive defendants prison sentences that were, on average, 22 months longer than those they gave to attractive defendants.'
. . . I despair of finding a way to see our general pattern of which discriminations we allow as an application of some general moral principle. Instead it seems more likely that recent cultural elites preferred to discourage the types of discrimination that favored their cultural competitors, while retaining the types that favored them or their allies. For example, since today’s cultural elites tend to be pretty, they have little interest in preventing discrimination against the ugly.
(Emphasis added by me).

LOST: A Report Card on the Finale

First off, let me just say the finale was very touching and very entertaining.  They replayed old motifs with the castaways' "flashes of memory", redeemed characters, and made use of familiar imagery for new action.  I have no thematic or aesthetic complaints.  It was all beautifully done, even ending with Jack's eye closing, Vincent cuddling next to him, Hugo giving Ben the attention he needed so badly, and Juliet and Sawyer having their moment.

However, they chose not to answer any questions. At all. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.  Let me explain:

While I have been what some might call an "answer zealot" for some time now, what I really am is a "context zealot."  I didn't necessarily want to know how everything worked, but I did want to know if there was a framework in which time travel, Widmore, Eloise, Dharma, and Smokey all fit.  There was not.  Given that, I am actually glad that they chose not to even try to answer any questions.  If they had, they would have been bad answers.  What we learned from the finale is that every device used, every reference and allusion, and every strange occurrence was a red herring, meant only to keep us interested while the writers were getting us attached to the great characters they created.  That being the case, I can't fault them for then choosing to ignore these mysteries in the final, and instead revisit every major character from the series (minus Eko) and letting them have some satisfaction . . .

. . . even if it came at the hand of Purgatory. Yes, folks, that's what sideways-land was all along.  Purgatory. We weren't watching an alternate reality created by The Incident. We weren't watching the end result of Smokey doing anything. Just purgatory. That's fine, whatever.

Unfortunately, what that also means is that the writers chose an explanation to the sideways world that still doesn't make much sense. After all:

  • If it was purgatory all along, why did they feel the need to show us a sunken island in the season premiere?  It had no significance.  
  • How is it exactly that Desmond's being exposed to electromagnetism by Widmore allowed Desmond to enter purgatory temporarily before his death?

But that's not all.  The show's island resolution was just not internally consistent.  For example:

  • What was Widmore's purpose in bringing Desmond?  As it turns out, his unplugging of the source does exactly what Smokey wants.  Did Widmore bring him so that Desmond could replug it if Smokey managed to unplug it? It doesn't seem likely, since the show suggested that Smokey couldn't do it himself, since he probably would have done it before.
  • Shouldn't Jack's soul have been ripped from his body after being exposed to the Light Source, like what happened to the Man in Black in "Across the Sea"?  Like MIB, he was just a man, having tranferred his Jacob-powers to Hurley before rappelling down into the cave.  Shouldn't he have emerged a smoke monster himself, the fate "worse than death" that Jacob's mother describes?  I mean, if you're going to attribute the origin of Smokey to magic, ought not that magic be consistently applied?

Incidentally, the only question that I would have really liked to have answered is what the Man in Black's long con actually accomplished.  Couldn't he have gotten Ben to kill Jacob in a less circuitous way?  Certainly one without having anyone turn the donkey wheel (twice), going back in time, or coming back to the island.  Also, why did Jacob let himself get killed so easily by Ben if it was so vital for someone to protect the island? We saw him kick the shit out of Richard, so we know he could fight. Also, who was protecting the island when Jacob was off-island molesting people and reading Flannery O'Connor novels? Also, what prevented Ben from killing Widmore when he snuck into Widmore's bedroom to tell him that he was going to kill Penelope?  And who was Tall Ghost Walt (the one that prevented Locke from killing himself, getting him to kill Naomi and almost prevent the Freighter from getting to the island), since I thought Smokey could only take the form of the dead?  And yeah, how did Smokey appear as Christian to Michael on the Freighter, which was outside the realm of the island (beyond the special bearing, and across the water)?  Oh, and why exactly did the Ajira flight propel the Losties to 1977, except for Sun, and why not Sun (yeah, she wasn't a candidate, probably because she was a mom, which disqualified Kate, but Kate went back, and what would being a candidate have to do with going back in time anyway?)?  Oh, and what about that magic box that saved Juliet's sister from cancer and made Anthony Cooper appear out of nowhere?  And Eloise preventing Desmond from marrying Penelope after he turns the failsafe key? And how did Dharma know how to keep Smokey out with those pylons (and why would it work)?  And what exactly made Sayid come back from the dead?  And all those island fertility problems, er . . .

If they could only have answered that one question.

But hey, the show was a great ride.  The answers it did provide during the course of the first five seasons were good ones.  Desmond was in the hatch.  Desmond's not pushing the button caused the Oceanic 815 crash. Dharma found the island using Foucault's pendulum. The runway the Others were building in Season Three was for the Ajira flight.  The castaways caused The Incident. Eloise and Widmore were Others.  The Black Rock destroyed the Statue.  All decent answers that will be remembered fondly before the sea change of Season Six.

However, I have but one last question for the producers:  If you knew it was going to end like this, then why limit the show to six seasons?  I mean, honestly, you could have given us a purgatory sideways flash at any time, and the action of Season Six didn't really directly lead us to the final moments (all you really needed was Ben, a couple candidates, and Desmond on the island, in any capacity).  A couple more seasons to explore New Otherton and Dharmaville would have been fun.  Perhaps even in an unforced, non-didactic mystery-resolving way.  Too bad.

Americans on Libertarianism: Pew Says We're Split Down the Middle

According to a Pew Research Center poll:
38 percent of Americans view "libertarian" favorably to 37 who view it unfavorably. Democrats (39-37) and independents (44-32) view the term most favorably, while Republicans view it negatively by a 13-point (31-44) margin.
I guess that means that another 25% are indifferent to libertarianism.  Perhaps they weren't given a definition of the term in the poll question.   Also, Id like to meet one of these libertarian-liking Dems.   Haven't seen one in a long, long time.

HT to David Weigel

David Friedman Thinks that Municipalities "Boycotting" Arizona Might Just Be Unconstitutional

An interesting thought. The grounds? Any of the following:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

Scientists Show Nonpartisan Side on the Gulf Oil Disaster

According to the New York Times, prominent oceanographers are accusing the Obama administration of "failing to conduct an adequate scientific analysis of the damage and of allowing BP to obscure the spill’s true scope."  Let's give them credit for not whitewashing the government's response because of their political affinities.

I Kicked Smokey's Ass and All I Got Was an Awesome Vacation in Great Britain

I just barely evaded "Smokey" twice in the past two weeks -- once to get to London and once to get out of London, yesterday.  Heathrow was closed between 1am and 7am, and I was supposed to leave at 10am.  That pissant ash cloud could only delay me by a mere hour and fifteen minutes.  Eejit!

Anyway, here are some quick hits on the Brits:
- The Brits are unrepentant jaywalkers, and I both love them (for not obeying dumb rules) and hate them for it (almost got killed several times for being a blind follower).
- The food was great. The fried haddock and steak ale pie at World's End in Edinburgh was top notch.  Don't listen to the naysayers.
- It wasn't that expensive.  Transportation costs were high (get the Oyster card in London!), but you can find reasonable lodging (Travelodge) and food (pubs) if you try.
- I love traveling during elections.  Saw Sarkozy get elected in Japan, Merkel get elected while in Paris, and Obama get elected while in Barcelona.  This time I got to be there during the election and aftermath of a hung parliament (not as sexy as it sounds) and then watched as the  the Tories and the Lib Dems eked out a coalition.  Exciting stuff.
- According to British folk, I have a very strange accent.  They couldn't really understand me all the time, even though I had no problem hearing most of them, most of the time.  It's good to learn about how others perceive you. Now I will fashion myself a King's English the quality of which Chicago has never seen.